By MNLSpayday loans

Archive

Archive for the ‘CyberRights’ Category

Two days in Panama

March 8th, 2013 No comments

Business took me again to Panama on Monday, for a quick trip (two days).

Tin roofed huts with satellite TV next to high rise office buildings, riding on an official (with sirens) tinted window SUV with driver and no license plates, and staying in a nice hotel that was not extraordinary but had all and everything that I look for in a hotel (except indoors swimming pool). But it belongs to the friend (former Treasury Secretary) of a friend.

Back on the Tucuman airport I had to endure the double security screening (at the entrance of airport boarding gates, and again at my boarding gate). Why? Because someone in the USA (perhaps a company participated by the Carlyle Group?) has “convinced” US officials that they have to pressure (or should I say “bully”) other airports into incorporating their own US-made scanners and metal detectors. Why? Money. Not security (because the airport’s security was much better than the US-gadget gate security). After all, it’s about the perception of security, security by obfuscation, business, money, profit… who cares about passengers rights?

Interviewed for Zoom News about the Mega case

January 23rd, 2013 No comments

Interviewed by Aurora Muñoz for Zoom News about the Mega case.

Minecraft, derivative works, parodies…

August 9th, 2012 No comments

Hugo sends me this amazing song/video made in Minecraft. Of course, that leads to 10 more, 14 more… there are so many!

When you make the tools available to the people, and allow them to create (in this case under the safe harbor of “parody”) wonderful things happen. It’s NOT all about the money, profit, control… It’s about imagination, art, creativity, culture. That’s how it happens: copying, re-using, mixing, adjusting, modifying… that’s what creativity is really about (or did you think it was about “inventing” and “making unheard of things out of thin air”?).

NYPL support and citizen budget involvement

June 21st, 2012 No comments

After supporting the NYPL efforts to fight back budget cuts, I have received a lovely message of thanks from Christine C. Quinn (Speaker, NYC Council), along with a very nice suggestion:

Dear New Yorker, 

Many thanks for your email expressing your support for our city’s libraries. 

[...]

We can’t do it alone, though, and I hope you’ll consider signing up for Council “enews”.  These issue-based e-mail updates are a great way for us to stay connected and engaged with you and other New Yorkers about the budget, healthcare, and other important issues affecting our city.  It should only take a minute (or two) to sign up at http://council.nyc.gov/html/action_center/enews.shtml.

[...]

I often complain about US politics, policies, and politicians. But the level of citizen involvement with and information about government and administration that is possible in this country is usually underestimated. Compare that with Spain’s PP Rajoy “missing” and “opaque” government. Sad.

I admire these criminals

April 13th, 2012 No comments

In Spain, the conservative PP government is planning to make “passive resistance” a crime (as well as organizing demonstrations using internet technologies).

I have these 4 criminals’ magnetic puppets on my fridge. 2 were outlawed (and had to flee) by German Nazis. 1 had to flee Spanish dictatorship because he was a Communist. And the other one was thrown in jail by British occupation forces for “passive resistance”.

I will not let anyone walk through my mind with their dirty feet.

Mahatma Gandhi

Playing with face.com face recognition technology

April 6th, 2012 No comments

While I am preparing a loooooong post about technology and privacy (with a provocative twist, for a change :twisted: ), I have decided to play with face.com‘s face recognition technology.

What do you think? On target (hint: no, not on target, I am not THAT old, and definitely I AM a male)? Scary (hint: only if we are unaware of these technologies and their uses)?…

 

The price of standing up for your rights: Opt-Out at Atlanta’s airport scanner

April 3rd, 2012 No comments

Atlanta’s Hartsfield airport has been having one of those useless scanners that show passengers naked for a while now. But the last time I was there, they were being tested, and most passengers did not go through them. 

Today, though, as I approached the security line, I saw that next to every metal detector, there was one of those scanners. “Wow, this is getting worse”, I thought, while seeing how almost everybody was going through the scanners. 

When my turn came, I stepped in front of the metal detector, and the female TSA agent in front of the scanner told me: 

– Sir, you need to go through here.

– No, I don’t. –I replied– I prefer to go through the metal detector.

– Everybody has to go through here – she replied while a very large woman, a child, and an old man were being told by another (male) TSA agent to go through the metal detector.

– Obviously that is not true – I reply, looking at the line being formed in front of the metal detector.

Sensing a growing discomfort in my interlocutor, and not feeling like the situation called for a confrontation, I decided to explain further:

– I have medical, political, and personal objections to the use of those scanners, particularly on me.

– This sign shows there is no need for concern, sir – she stubbornly tells me, turning a sign that was not readily visible by passengers towards me.

The misleading sign basically said (too bad she would not let me take a picture) something along the lines that the scanner was safe, and it software allowed TSA agents to guarantee our safety. No mention of political, privacy, misuse, or medical concerns.

– Still, I refuse to go through the scanner, and since the metal detector is right here, and working, I prefer to go through the metal detector like those people.

– You then will have to be patted down by a male TSA agent. Is that OK? –She says.

– I don’t see those people who have gone through the metal detector before me being patted down.

– Sir, those are the regulations: if you opt-out you need to go through the metal detector and you need to be patted down.

I decided there was no use in arguing with her regarding the correct use and meaning of the word “need”. I also decided that the accuracy of her claims could be checked later, because going through the trouble of doing it on the spot could make me loose my flight, so I agreed, and went through the metal detector.

The TSA male agent standing by the metal detector told me as soon as I went through (without a “beep” or issue):

– Sir, you need to stand here –right next to him and the detector; there goes the “need” again.

I obediently stand where he points.

– ”Male opt-out on line 14-15!” –he calls for through his intercom.

And I wait there.

And wait some more.

And he calls again.

And I wait. 

And in the meantime, several people go through the metal detector without pat-downs. All kinds of ages, races, genders…

And wait some more.

I move about 3 inches to check my carryon luggage, shoes, laptop, phone, watch and wallet, waiting for me at the end of the object x-ray scanner, to make sure nobody takes anything “by mistake” (since the people that are “taking care of our security” do not seem to care about our property).

– Sir, I asked you to stand right here –he reminds me, pointing to what seem to be directly my feet.

I don’t know if my look conveyed the “WTF” correctly. I wish I could have typed it on my phone’s LED screen app.

He calls again.

I wait.

And wait.

Some 30 minutes later (one thing one learns after decades of air travel and security checkpoints is that there is no point in worrying about missing the flight once you are “on your way”) a female TSA agent comes and says “you pat him down, I got the line”.

So the male TSA agent, very professionally explains to me the whole procedure (his explaining took about double the time the procedure itself), and asks me several times if I understand and if I am OK with that, adding that we can go to a private screening room if I feel uncomfortable going through that in public.

I do feel uncomfortable in public, pat down or not, so the private screening room does not offer me any relief.

Then my luggage gets “screened” and a particle sample taken from my clothes is run through the explosives detector.

All that because I dared to choose? to exercise my rights? to speak up and stand up for what I believe?

I don’t care how difficult fascism (yes, I understand the severity of the word, know its history, and chose it accordingly) makes my life. I will fight, take it, or flee. But I am NOT jumping through their loop. And I will not keep quiet.

[Note: I am writing this while I wait to board my plane. On the TV screen, the news of yet another school shooting. And the CNN anchor woman asks "time for students to carry guns in campus to protect themselves?" WTF!! Yet, no word about the annoying uselessness of outrageously expensive airport security, who by the way NEVER stopped any "terrorist attempt"]

To top it off, I have missed the CUNY Graduate Center talk “The Brain” by Richard Axel and Lawrence F. Abbott.

Infographic on the Hypocrisy in Hollywood

March 4th, 2012 No comments

 

Peter sends me this (thanks!): Hypocrisy in Hollywood Created by: Paralegal.net

Better privacy through your browser

March 1st, 2012 No comments

Do you want to improve your online privacy? Go ahead, install HTTPS and Collusion.

MLK speech “I have a dream” under restrictive copyright

February 8th, 2012 No comments

Embarrassing. We should all be ashamed. At least we can access his words.